<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>Arnold Rosoff - Faculty Research in Knowledge@Wharton</title>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/</link>
	<description>Knowledge@Wharton is an online resource that offers the latest business insights, information, and research from a variety of sources. Content includes analysis of current business trends, interviews with industry leaders and faculty, articles based on the most recent business research, book reviews, conference and seminar reports, and links to other websites.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania</copyright>
	
	
	<item>
	<title>Profits and Social Responsibility: Chastened Drug Makers Step Up Efforts to Bring Affordable Medicines to Poor Countries</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2710&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>A decade after pharmaceutical companies took heat for their reluctance to make HIV/AIDS drugs widely available to impoverished African nations, the industry has changed its approach on pricing and access to drugs. Now, advocates for social responsibility in global health are focusing on how companies decide which drugs they will develop and how they manage operations in the developing world. New approaches include sharing patented compounds with companies developing treatments for tropical diseases, and rewarding companies that develop treatments for neglected Third World diseases.&amp;nbsp;</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:00:50 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Fighting for Common Ground: Will Business and the New Congress Get Along?</title>
	<category>Law and Public Policy</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2706&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>Even with a friendlier Congress and conciliatory tones from the White House, businesses face major challenges in Washington as a still-weak economy makes it difficult for a divided government and various industries to push their agendas forward. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has called for deficit reduction, restraints on government spending, lower taxes, fewer government regulations and improvements in education and infrastructure, while the Obama Administration&apos;s top request for businesses is to add more jobs -- all positive&amp;nbsp;goals, but&amp;nbsp;a lot stands in the way of making them a reality.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:51:26 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Health Care Reform: Not Ready to Be Discharged Yet</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2457&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>America&apos;s health care reform may be out of the emergency room, but its prognosis remains sketchy. Passage of the historic 2,400-page legislation by no means ended the health care debate, say Wharton experts: It just splintered one massive question mark into a lot of new big ones. As one Wharton professor noted: &amp;quot;The current legislation is going to be in play for a good long time.&amp;quot; But he also pointed out that the bill offers new business opportunities in such areas as medical information technology, education and methods of delivery.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:51:19 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Social Security and Medicare: Trying to Tackle Two 800-pound Gorillas</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2238&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>While many people worry about the billions of dollars spent bailing out banks, auto makers and other&amp;nbsp;sectors,&amp;nbsp;shortfalls in Medicare and Social Security are what&amp;nbsp;could ultimately sink efforts to revive the U.S. economy. As 78 million baby boomers begin to retire, funding for the government&apos;s two primary old-age security plans grows increasingly precarious, suggest several Wharton faculty. A report released earlier this week by trustees of Social Security and Medicare echoes those concerns.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:53:27 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Avoiding the Tough Issues: The Candidates on Health Care and Entitlements</title>
	<category>Law and Public Policy</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2070&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&amp;quot;We were so concerned about the $700 billion in the bailout bill, but nobody is talking seriously about the $12 trillion we need to make Social Security whole and the $65 trillion we need to make Medicare whole,&amp;quot; says Wharton professor Olivia Mitchell, referring to issues being debated in the U.S. presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the candidates promise to expand health care coverage without offering details about how they can finance their proposals.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:48:07 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>The Benefits, and Potential Side Effects, of Sharing Medical Records Online</title>
	<category>Managing Technology</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1846&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;On October 4, Microsoft launched HealthVault, a free web-based service that allows users to store their medical records online and eventually share them with doctors. On October 17, an executive at&amp;nbsp;Google&amp;nbsp;noted the company&apos;s interest in health information services. And on November 19, 23andMe announced a program that will allow consumers to pay $999 for the privilege of exploring their own genomes. These efforts could give patients more control over their medical records and let them share information with doctors, nutritionists or athletic trainers, among others. But the concept also faces serious hurdles, such as privacy concerns, the absence of an accepted standard for sharing medical information, and a health care industry that is reluctant to change, according to experts in the field.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:54:07 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Presidential Candidates Push Health Care Reform, but Who Will Pay?</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1827&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;span style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana&quot;&gt;As medical costs escalate and the number of Americans without health insurance continues to rise, the 2008 presidential candidates have responded by putting health care near the top of their agendas. Indeed, many candidates have already laid out detailed programs to address the nation&apos;s health care problems. As a result, meaningful change in the system seems likely to occur once a new president takes office. As Mark V. Pauly, Wharton professor of health care systems, notes: &amp;quot;I&apos;m optimistic this time that we&apos;ll get something.... There is actually a chance of doing more good than harm, and I wouldn&apos;t have said that in some other years.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:23:27 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>&apos;Harry and Louise,&apos; the Sequel? The Universal Health Care Debate Is Back</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1761&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;In 1993, a television ad featuring &quot;Harry and Louise&quot; -- a &quot;typical&quot; American couple dismayed by the Clinton administration&apos;s universal health care proposal -- helped to kill health care reform in the U.S. for the next decade. With the 2008 presidential election in sight, the debate has resurfaced, but are the prospects for universal health care any better today? In an ongoing study of health care systems spanning five countries, Arnold J. Rosoff, Wharton professor of legal studies and business ethics, has identified a set of factors that, in one combination or another, come into play when a country commits to adopting universal health care. This time, he says, one thing seems likely: Instead of a health care &quot;revolution&quot; in the U.S., change will come in increments.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:13:32 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>When Taking Two Aspirin Won’t Do: A Primer on the Patients’ Bill of Rights</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=397&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>Anyone who has received a brochure describing medical coverage options knows just how baffling and legalistic the language can be. So, too, is the ongoing debate over the so-called “patients’ bill of rights” currently winding its way through the U.S. Congress. To help explain some of the key issues, Knowledge@Wharton asked Wharton faculty members for their views on what the final bill should include.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
	</rss>

