<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>Daniel Levinthal - Faculty Research in Knowledge@Wharton</title>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/</link>
	<description>Knowledge@Wharton is an online resource that offers the latest business insights, information, and research from a variety of sources. Content includes analysis of current business trends, interviews with industry leaders and faculty, articles based on the most recent business research, book reviews, conference and seminar reports, and links to other websites.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania</copyright>
	
	
	<item>
	<title>3D Movies: Adding Depth or Falling Flat?</title>
	<category>Managing Technology</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2062&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>Dreamworks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg called the latest 3D movie technology &amp;quot;the greatest innovation to occur in the movie business in 70 years.&amp;quot; A bevy of theater chains are exploring or installing digital cinema and 3D systems in the second half of 2008 into 2009. Intel and others are creating tools for companies to make a new generation of 3D animation films. Experts at Wharton say 3D movies are back in vogue, but it&apos;s unclear whether the latest greatest technology can give theaters a sustainable competitive advantage over other forms of entertainment.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:54:21 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Short-Circuited: Cutting Jobs as Corporate Strategy</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1703&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;When Circuit City announced last week that it was laying off 3,400 workers so it could rehire new ones at lower salaries, it raised the question of just what strategic benefits the company -- or any company -- expects to achieve through employee downsizing. Clearly these benefits depend on the underlying strength of the organization and the specific reasons behind the cost-cutting, but most experts agree that unless layoffs are part of a well-planned strategy, the move could cause as many problems as it was intended to cure.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:37:12 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>A New Tool for Resurrecting an Old Theory of the Firm</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1480&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;It&apos;s one of the oldest, most fundamental ideas in management theory: that executives should understand how the many distinct functional components of a firm -- production, distribution, product mix, human resources -- interrelate to achieve the proper fit. In recent years, however, this notion of comprehending the &quot;part-whole&quot; relationship of the firm fell out of favor as thinkers turned to other concepts -- such as relying on core competencies to attain competitive advantage. Now, two professors in Wharton&apos;s management department, Daniel A. Levinthal and Nicolaj Siggelkow, say it is time to once again address the part-whole concept. Without this systemic way of looking at companies, the researchers note, firms run the risk of engaging in compartmentalized thinking that can work to their disadvantage. The two scholars have addressed issues related to firm positioning and the part-whole relationship of the firm in a number of papers and articles.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 15:28:37 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>As Sony Gets a Tune-up, Samsung Zooms Ahead</title>
	<category>Leadership and Change</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1293&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;In the same month that Sony laid off 10,000 workers amid a restructuring, Samsung announced a memory chip that will double the capacity of digital cameras and music devices, a new line of 50-inch plasma television sets and plans to create a new mobile phone design. The contrast between the two companies is stark. Sony, based in Tokyo, announced on September 22 that it is retooling to better integrate its media and electronics businesses. Meanwhile, Seoul-based Samsung remains focused on a key goal: To become the next Sony.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:43:39 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Sony&apos;s Next Act: Will It Play?</title>
	<category>Leadership and Change</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1284&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;At the end of the month, Sony CEO Howard Stringer intends to release his grand plan to help the struggling Japanese consumer electronics and media giant regain its past glory. The big question is whether the company - whose sales totaled $66.9 billion in 2004 - has the corporate will to make a comeback. No one denies that Stringer has his work cut out for him. On July 28, the company reported its second consecutive quarterly net loss, a deficit of $66 million for the first quarter ending June 30, and substantially cut its profit outlook for the current fiscal year. Wharton experts and others discuss what caused Sony to stumble and what the company needs to do to get back in the game.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:26:48 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Free Advice from Wharton: Here&apos;s What Hewlett-Packard&apos;s New CEO Should Do</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1181&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;When it was announced on March 29 that the board of Hewlett-Packard had tapped Mark V. Hurd to be the company&apos;s new CEO and president, the most notable part of the deal was Hurd&apos;s relative obscurity. But in the weeks and months to come, Hurd will be front and center. His personality may be lower key than that of the flashy Fiorina, but Wharton faculty members say he faces tough strategic decisions that will raise his visibility at a company whose stock has plummeted in value in the last five years. Chief among the decisions facing Hurd: Should H-P, which acquired Compaq Computer in a controversial move by Fiorina in September 2001, be broken up?&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2005 15:57:04 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Is It time to Give Up on AOL Time Warner?</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=718&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>When America Online bought Time Warner for $103.5 billion in January 2001, the plan was to meld new-economy Internet prowess with old-economy content and cutting-edge broadband delivery. The scheme’s designers boasted they would create the world’s largest corporation. Now, just over two years later, AOL Time Warner is a shambles. Was this just bad luck? Was the merger ill-conceived to begin with? And will the company now resort to selling off major assets in an attempt to reduce its enormous debt?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Sony vs. Sony</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=569&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>As the recording and electronics industries face off over digital music, one company has had the uniquely uncomfortable position of standing on both sides of the issue: Sony. The only company to own a major music label, a major computer manufacturer and a major consumer electronics business, Sony has been insulted by its own trade associations and has even sued a company that Sony itself had invested in. Wharton professors and others suggest a new business model to help Sony out.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2002 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Hewlett-Packard and Compaq: If It Goes Through, Here’s How to Try and Make It Work</title>
	<category>Strategic Management</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=422&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>Faculty members at Wharton who have studied mergers and acquisitions and industry consolidations say Wall Street’s thumbs-down on Hewlett-Packard’s proposed acquisition of Compaq comes as no surprise. Still, if H-P and Compaq proceed with the transaction and receive shareholder and regulatory approval, there still may be additional ways to try to strengthen the new company’s competitive position, say several professors.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:00:00 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
	</rss>
