<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>Scott Harrington - Faculty Research in Knowledge@Wharton</title>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/</link>
	<description>Knowledge@Wharton is an online resource that offers the latest business insights, information, and research from a variety of sources. Content includes analysis of current business trends, interviews with industry leaders and faculty, articles based on the most recent business research, book reviews, conference and seminar reports, and links to other websites.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania</copyright>
	
	
	<item>
	<title>Avoiding the Tough Issues: The Candidates on Health Care and Entitlements</title>
	<category>Law and Public Policy</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=2070&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&amp;quot;We were so concerned about the $700 billion in the bailout bill, but nobody is talking seriously about the $12 trillion we need to make Social Security whole and the $65 trillion we need to make Medicare whole,&amp;quot; says Wharton professor Olivia Mitchell, referring to issues being debated in the U.S. presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the candidates promise to expand health care coverage without offering details about how they can finance their proposals.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:48:07 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Presidential Candidates Push Health Care Reform, but Who Will Pay?</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1827&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;span style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana&quot;&gt;As medical costs escalate and the number of Americans without health insurance continues to rise, the 2008 presidential candidates have responded by putting health care near the top of their agendas. Indeed, many candidates have already laid out detailed programs to address the nation&apos;s health care problems. As a result, meaningful change in the system seems likely to occur once a new president takes office. As Mark V. Pauly, Wharton professor of health care systems, notes: &amp;quot;I&apos;m optimistic this time that we&apos;ll get something.... There is actually a chance of doing more good than harm, and I wouldn&apos;t have said that in some other years.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:23:27 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>After Decades of Malaise, the Vaccine Industry Is Getting an Injection</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1306&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;After decades of decline, the vaccine industry is gaining new interest from drug makers and the federal government in response to last year&apos;s flu-shot shortage, concerns about an avian flu pandemic, and the development of potential vaccines targeted at new markets, including cancer. Still, vaccines remain a small piece of the overall drug market -- less than 3% of the global pharmaceutical industry -- and vaccine manufacturers continue to face liability problems and low payments from public-health customers, according to Wharton faculty and other experts. In the face of these obstacles, what will it take to inject some life into the ailing industry?&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:31:57 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>The Financial Risks of Terrorism: Balancing Public and Private Roles</title>
	<category>Insurance and Pensions</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1261&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;Who should pay for the economic consequences of a terrorist attack in the United States? This week, the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center publishes &lt;I&gt;TRIA and Beyond,&lt;/I&gt; an analysis of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA), which will expire December 31, 2005, if not renewed. The Risk Center&apos;s report offers policymakers, key industry representatives and other interested parties an analysis of what roles the public and private sectors should play with respect to terrorism risk coverage in the United States.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 15:24:58 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
	</rss>
