<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
	<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>Guy David - Faculty Research in Knowledge@Wharton</title>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/</link>
	<description>Knowledge@Wharton is an online resource that offers the latest business insights, information, and research from a variety of sources. Content includes analysis of current business trends, interviews with industry leaders and faculty, articles based on the most recent business research, book reviews, conference and seminar reports, and links to other websites.</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009 The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania</copyright>
	
	
	<item>
	<title>Presidential Candidates Push Health Care Reform, but Who Will Pay?</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1827&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;span style=&quot;FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana&quot;&gt;As medical costs escalate and the number of Americans without health insurance continues to rise, the 2008 presidential candidates have responded by putting health care near the top of their agendas. Indeed, many candidates have already laid out detailed programs to address the nation&apos;s health care problems. As a result, meaningful change in the system seems likely to occur once a new president takes office. As Mark V. Pauly, Wharton professor of health care systems, notes: &amp;quot;I&apos;m optimistic this time that we&apos;ll get something.... There is actually a chance of doing more good than harm, and I wouldn&apos;t have said that in some other years.&amp;quot;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:23:27 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>After Decades of Malaise, the Vaccine Industry Is Getting an Injection</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1306&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;After decades of decline, the vaccine industry is gaining new interest from drug makers and the federal government in response to last year&apos;s flu-shot shortage, concerns about an avian flu pandemic, and the development of potential vaccines targeted at new markets, including cancer. Still, vaccines remain a small piece of the overall drug market -- less than 3% of the global pharmaceutical industry -- and vaccine manufacturers continue to face liability problems and low payments from public-health customers, according to Wharton faculty and other experts. In the face of these obstacles, what will it take to inject some life into the ailing industry?&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 16:31:57 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	<item>
	<title>Why Bush and Kerry are Wrong on Health Care</title>
	<category>Health Economics</category>
	<link>http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1051&amp;source=rss</link>
	<description>&lt;SPAN style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana&quot;&gt;Though health care has taken a backseat to Iraq and the economy in this year&apos;s presidential campaign, the two candidates have put forth detailed - and vastly different - proposals to solve the three broad issues facing American health care consumers: mushrooming cost, inadequate availability and uneven quality. Yet Wharton health care experts doubt either candidate&apos;s plan could be enacted as proposed - or would lick all those problems if it were. Here is what they suggest instead.&lt;/SPAN&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:21:18 EST</pubDate>
	</item>
	
	</channel>
	</rss>
