Knowledge@Wharton Strategic Management Research Article

View Article on Knowledge@Wharton Mobile

For New CEO John Donahoe, 'It's eBay's Game to Lose'

Published: February 06, 2008 in Knowledge@Wharton
    Download Audio Play Audio
Article Image
Print Get PDF of Article Send a Comment
Share this Article

On January 29, online auctioneer eBay unveiled plans to revamp the fees it charges sellers, reduce fraud and increase the volume of transactions. It's the first move by CEO-elect John Donahoe, who will take over the reins of eBay on March 31 in the wake of long-time CEO Meg Whitman's announcement that she plans to step down.

Donahoe's mission is to reinvigorate a company that remains dominant in online auctions, but is vulnerable to increased competition from large rivals, such as Amazon.com and Google, as well as smaller e-commerce sites like Etsy, which specializes in handmade crafts. EBay is also facing slowing growth. Its fourth quarter product listings -- a measure of the number of goods for sale -- were up just 4% from a year ago and the number of active users on the site is flat.

Experts at Wharton say that eBay isn't in dire straits, but if it wants to increase growth it has to make changes and focus on its core competencies. According to Wharton management professor Raffi Amit, eBay has taken a few strategic detours -- such as its 2005 acquisition of Internet telecommunications company Skype. When eBay acquired Skype, executives said its communications services would be integrated into the company's auction platform. "I never [understood] the Skype deal. I'm never sure I got down the key ideas behind it," says Amit. In 2007, eBay took a $1.4 billion goodwill impairment charge -- an acknowledgement that a particular acquisition didn't generate the value initially expected -- related to the Skype deal.

Wharton marketing professor Eric Bradlow agrees that eBay may have lost some of the focus it had as a startup. "EBay, like any mature firm, needs to understand the value added it provides over the competition.... For eBay, it is brand recognition which gives it higher awareness and higher trust." Adds Kartik Hosanagar, a professor of operations and information management at Wharton, "In some ways, the economics of eBay's business are great. The business model is such that the gross margins are very healthy. EBay's problem is just that it is mature now, and growth has stalled."

Analysts suggest that eBay's business model, which largely relies on charging merchant fees upfront, could use a few tweaks. Marianne Wolk, an analyst with Susquehanna Financial Group, said in a research note that "eBay's business model has been out of sync with the performance-based models popularized by the search economy," which dictates that users pay for performance, such as a lead to complete a sale. Applied to eBay, this approach would mean that eBay should collect more money when a sale is successful.

To remedy the problem, eBay cut listing fees 25% to 30%, but raised the fees it charges when an item is sold. In a speech before 200 North American sellers on January 29,Donahoe said that the new fee structure minimizes the risk for sellers if an item doesn't sell. "Put simply, we will make more of our money when sellers are successful," Donahoe stated.

Wharton faculty say Donahoe will have to do more than change fees for auction listings: He will need to push eBay to be more innovative. "EBay has to be more aggressive and think about strategic planning five to 10 years down the line," says David Hsu, a management professor at Wharton. "You can't transform overnight, but you do have to be able to assess the future better than others."

One point on Donahoe's side is timing. According to Hsu, Donahoe takes over as CEO at an opportune moment. Since Donahoe is a company insider, he already has the trust of employees. Add to that the stagnant growth the company is experiencing, and the result is a mandate for Donahoe to make changes. "He knows the business and can experiment," says Hsu. Indeed, Donahoe seems prepared to take some chances, noting on eBay's fourth quarter conference call that he will "aggressively change our product, our customer approach and our business model."

Here's what should be on Donahoe's to-do list, according to Wharton faculty.

Perfect the Basics

On his earnings conference call, Donahoe outlined a few areas to address -- including fraud, the difficulties some have in navigating through eBay and the need for better search tools. All of these problems are being addressed in phases throughout 2008, he noted. "We're going to get very aggressive about making eBay easier and safer to use. The Net has evolved dramatically in recent years. Buyers have become accustomed to streamlined purchasing experiences that put a premium on speed, convenience and reliability. While we have made strides in these areas, I am clear that we need to do much more."

Analysts say that eBay needs to better integrate its auctions with the fixed-price shopping convenience offered at sites like Amazon. EBay already offers a hybrid auction/fixed price approach with its "buy it now" feature, and that could give the company an edge. The company should keep the excitement of winning an auction while providing the easy convenience of buying at a set price, says Bradlow. "This hybrid model is clever in that it allows customers to have it their way," he notes. 

Donahoe himself has suggested that "eBay's next wave of growth is going to come from weaving the strengths of auctions with our fixed price in a uniquely eBay way. Auctions attract enormous value, selection and fun to eBay but for many sellers and buyers and for many products, auctions are just not the optimal format. So what we need to do is marry the value selection fun created by auctions with the convenience and opportunity inherent in fixed price." EBay, Donahoe added, is also reworking its search abilities, making it easier to add pictures to listings, and is changing its web site to improve the company's merchant rating system.

These planned changes are good steps, but as Bradlow notes, because "people have an expectation that Internet retailers will be more innovative," eBay will be held to a higher standard than other companies, and will have to not just meet, but "exceed expectations."

Hosanagar echoes Bradlow's point about innovation being a core competency. EBay's challenge is to launch innovative new services -- either through acquisitions or experimentation within the company. "[Innovation] is always a challenge for mature firms. Some firms have successfully driven growth by innovation, like Apple, or acquisition, like Cisco. EBay has had mixed results with acquisitions. My take is that eBay has done a poor job of identifying synergistic opportunities. Similarly, although eBay has a research group, it has not been able to drive much growth by internal innovation." EBay, Hsu adds, has to get that "spark the company had in the early days."

Pick a Strategic Path

Amit suggests that another key chore for Donahoe is to outline a strategic plan. EBay has two alternatives typically faced by companies that grow fast and then mature. "It can either have total focus on the one thing that it does best and penetrate new markets. Or ... it can take its core competencies and expand into related businesses where its auctions are a complement."

If eBay were to focus on taking its core auction business to new markets, two obvious choices would be China and India, Amit says. Ebay has already ventured into China -- with mixed results. In 2003, eBay acquired Chinese company Eachnet to launch its China operation. However, in 2006, eBay put its Chinese operation into a joint venture with Tom Online, a local wireless Internet company. Analysts viewed the move as a retreat for eBay.

What's different this time? Amit says that credit card use is increasing in China and India, thereby making eBay's business model, which depends on electronic payment systems, more feasible. In that sense, eBay's first effort in China was too early, says Amit.There will be challenges in both China and India, but eBay could sustain growth for years in those markets.

Hosanagar agrees that eBay has to expand abroad, but acknowledges such moves are tricky. "EBay must figure out ways to have an impact elsewhere like it did in the United States. While eBay made significant investments in both China and India, both efforts were largely unsuccessful," he says, adding that trust is a major impediment to eBay's business in countries like India and China. But those issues could be overcome if eBay partners with local banks, insurance firms and even competitors to establish best practices. "EBay needs to do more in these countries to develop the market itself."

The other strategic approach sees eBay expanding into new, but auction-related, businesses through acquisition, says Amit. The auction giant already has a blueprint for this strategy with its acquisition of PayPal and Shopping.com. Using this approach, eBay could emulate companies like Cisco Systems and Oracle, which have completed dozens of acquisitions. The acquisition route could be risky, however, if eBay tries to diversify into unrelated businesses.

According to Hsu, another risk to any acquisition strategy is the drain on management time. If eBay were to start making larger acquisitions, it would require upper management attention to integration plans. A better route may be to focus on smaller deals. "The acquisition route is tough," says Hsu. "The question [eBay will have to face] is whether it wants to devote CEO time to integration or make smaller bets. It's best to go the targeted route."

Hosanagar suggests that before Donahoe focuses on any specific strategic plan, he needs to figure out what the company does best and then thread its existing businesses together better. "EBay must articulate a clear long-term positioning and core competence, and use that to guide its acquisition strategy." 

Can EBay Restore Past Glory?

Experts at Wharton say Donahoe will have his challenges managing eBay and boosting growth, but the company has resources at its disposal. Perhaps the biggest asset eBay has -- aside from $4.9 billion in cash and short-term investments as of December 31 -- is its community, says Amit. "Donahoe has a lot to work out, but he is sitting on enormous valuable assets such as community and reputation."

EBay can use the social nature of its site to create new tools that could improve the rate of purchases, he adds. "In many ways, the eBay community is a social network." Utilizing social networking and pursuing related businesses to complement auctions eBay could gain more "wallet share" from its existing customers.

Meanwhile, eBay's business model isn't broken. For the year ending December 31, 2007, eBay reported net income of $348 million on revenues of $7.67 billion. What is different, however, is that eBay now has more competition than ever. On Amazon's fourth quarter conference call, chief financial officer Thomas Szkutak said Amazon has been successful attracting outside merchants to use the e-commerce company's platform. Amazon's third-party merchant services resemble eBay's, with features such as seller ratings. The big difference is that Amazon's merchants sell at a fixed price while eBay conducts auctions. "Our seller business globally is very strong," Szkutak noted during the call. "We are continuing to try to work on that experience for sellers to make it even better. Certainly our goal is to have sellers increase their sales on our platform and so we continue to do a number of different things to make it easier for them" to accomplish that.

Google, which has its own payment system called Checkout to compete with eBay's PayPal, is also a threat, according to Hosanagar. But eBay has an excellent brand and can compete with its rivals. "EBay starts as a favorite," he says. "This is eBay's game to lose."

Back to Top

Here's what you think...

Total Comments: 6

#1    Changes at eBay

It's unfortunate that John Donahoe has made changes that are unpalatable to the sellers on eBay. Many are moving to other venues where costs are lower and not as susceptible to buyer fraud as eBays' PayPal system.

They are removing the only way a seller can warn others about a buyers unacceptable behavior in a transaction. After May, the only feedback a seller can leave is a positive while the buyer is free to leave a negative with no chance of being unearthed as a scammer.

Finally, eBays continous increases over the past four years have made selling a razor thin margin which has completely discouraged sellers.

All you have to do is read the community boards on eBay to see the depth of their disgust. Sellers are leaving and with good reason. The sellers central board would be a good place to start to verify how the selling community feels.

Sadly, Ebay is on a downward spiral and the top management doesn't have a clue how to reverse it.
By: Bill Taylor,
Sent: 04:36 PM Wed Feb.06.2008 - -

#2    Boycott Plan due to Ebay Changes

Nice article but you failed to capture how the changes are going to destroy many small businesses. Overall the fees are going to be higher - MUCH higher for the small seller. The new rule of holding a seller's payment for 21 days without paying interest is /or should be illegal - many are looking into the situation.

Ebay is in effect a monopoly - for now. Many sellers have banded together to fight these changes - Online Seller Cyber Union - In these hard economic times - eBay should be reducing fees and making it easier for the seller - not harder - WE ASK ALL PEOPLE TO JOIN THE BOYCOTT - NO BUYING - NO SELLING FEB 18TH - 25TH. JOIN THE ONLINE SELLER CYBER UNION - FOR MORE INFO - WWW.EBIZAUCTIONS.COM
By: Suzy Lancaster, Pigeon Alley Books/ Top floor mopper and all else
Sent: 07:24 PM Wed Feb.06.2008 - US

#3    Ebay and the new policies 2008

I think many sellers on eBay were similar in expectations to ourselves - it's the normal pre-spring rate hike announcement, but were floored by the sweeping changes outlined.

Stepping back to read over the changes and listen to the podcasts and fluff that alway goes with the normal rate hike at eBay, just did not work this time.

The more I read and studied the interrelated policies, the less I liked it at all. Pigeon Alley Books has ridden out some rate hikes and many changes, but this one was loaded with danger to all small volume sellers. The effect of one policy on another as applied to a seller spells out a high potential for a disaster coming for the small sellers and lower volume sellers.

The bulk of the people who make up the eBay community fall into this group. The small seller who is clearing out Aunt Minnie's stuff, the super garage sale mom who picks up extra money, the small business or hobby business and more.

The way the policies will affect the sellers starts with the new feed back policy. Most systems operate best under a check and balance system. The feedback system did have problems and eBay had tried to correct it with the DSR's, which began to skew the FB problems by actively unbalancing the trust in it by the much vaunted anonymity ( which wasn't- sellers could be notified of changes in DSR's with a simple program).

Now, Mr. Donahue says there will be no feedback left for buyers unless it positive. If FB was supposedly an opinion on how the entire transaction went, why limit it in such a way?

eBay claims that the buyer was "humiliated" by negative feedback being public. Two things - does eBay think negative FB is humiliating to a seller just as much or more so? And, for several years now, buyers were allowed to make their FB private and be able to buy, but sellers could not have private Fb and sell.

I think that was a case of some smoke blowing. Having a "bad" FB is supposed to be "humiliating, like a bad job performance report for an employee, and it helped keep things in check for both buyer and seller.

To go to the effect that the new Fb policy will have on sellers, it may be the start of the end of a small sellers' business on eBay.

Let me use an example to show how the 3 policies may well be used:

Seller is a lower volume, part time seller or sells about 100 things a month. The fee hike went up and he is busy allowing for that - some price changes, some numbers crunched.

Seller ships 4 items to 4 buyers within 1 to 2 days after order is paid by Money orders.

One buyer bought a book, choses media mail (post office est of transit time is 2 to 9 days), another buys a book and pays for priority, a third buys some vintage photo postcards, and the fourth buys 2 computer programs.

Buyer 1, who paid for media mail takes exception because it takes a full 2 weeks for the book to arrive and they needed it for a class a week ago. They leave the seller a negative and really ding the DSR for shipping time.

Buyer 2 is happy and leaves a positive FB, but marks the transaction at 3's on the DSRs as it is not great or bad, just average.

Buyer 3 decides they really do not like the postcards after all and leave a neutral, but dings the stars on description, though the ad was correct.

Buyer 4 with the two older heavy computer programs ( weight 7 pounds together with the manuals) leaves a negative complains of the shipping cost and dings the DSR's on all.

Now, eBay, in their new policies, looks in this last 30 day rolling review and sees stars are dropped and 2 negative, 1 neutral, tells the seller that they are now being dropped back down in search because of poor performance, and will either have to accept paypal or offer a merchant account.

Many small sellers do not qualify for a good rate on a merchant account, and so starts taking Paypal.

Now seller is dropped in search and has another fee from accepting paypal, and may be selling less but paying the same for the listing fees.

That is bad, but it gets worse.

Now paypal decides to have a reserve or hold the sellers money until one of three things happen:

1- buyer posts positive FB
2- delivery confirmation shows delivered, paypal waits 3 more days and pays the seller
3- Paypal holds the money for 21 days


So seller still is in trouble and trying to keep things working, and Paypal also tells them they must ship out of their own pocket, pay all expenses and get more stock without any money coming in.

It's a rough deal so far, but there is a chance seller can pull themselves out of the problems and do well again, except for ...

a scammer or nasty competitor comes along and the scammer buys, pays, receives and seeing that seller is in trouble ( feedback is public) tells them "give me a XX discount or I shall leave you a negative FB or claim non receipt." The nasty competitor has a throw away ID ( very easy to get buyers ID, no CC to sign up) which bids and maybe pays or not, but leaves bad FB for the small seller.

Small seller says the heck with this and closes his Paypal account and Paypal locks up all the monies in there for 180. (Section 10 in the user agreement with PP)

No interest on any of the money held by PP will have interest paid on it to the sellers.

Paypal is not a bank, not a credit union, and not FDIC insured.

How can the small sellers survive these high risk waters? How will they keep an item up in search, get their money and perserve a good name they have worked on for years?

Gentlemen, I have no degree in anything, so if you have an idea that will help the small and low volume sellers on eBay, I bet many would listen and heed your good advise.

This may not happen to some, but since it will take 2 to 3 bad or neutral FB for most small sellers to be up that infamous creek without a paddle and a leak in the canoe.

I'm not waiting to get my business name shredded by someone who has had a bad day or feels powerless in the rest of the world to damage my name, and business.

In the meantime for me, I closed our store on eBay, off to work on a website for me and list on at least 2 other sites, put many books on Amazon, purchase some key words for advertising, mailing out some information to all my previous customers, and watching to see what happens at eBay in the next 6 months to a year.

By: Suzy Lancaster, Pigeon Alley Books/ Top floor mopper and all else
Sent: 08:05 PM Wed Feb.06.2008 - US

#4    Damaging relations with the community

Last year eBay introduced a tougher Seller Nonperformance Policy (SNP) without notice and applied it retroactively. It was intended to target the worst 1% of sellers, who were said to be responsible for 35% of buyer dissatisfation. Unfortunately, it employs flawed assumptions and has a mathematical bias against lower volume sellers. Statistically meaningless results were often used to automatically restrict the sales activity of far more than the targeted group of sellers. Many were restricted unfairly, resulting in the loss of many good sellers.

Worse yet, eBay strongly recommended the use of Mutual Withdrawal of feedback (MW) to the restricted sellers. Some sellers found that they gained leverage in obtaining MW by leaving negative feedback for buyers who did not deserve it. This practice is known as Retaliatory Feedback. It has spread to sellers who were not restricted, but concerned that they might be.

Now eBay is planning to take away the ability of all sellers to leave honest neutral or negative feedback. Their rationale is that this will prevent buyers from receiving retaliatory feedback. Understandably, a huge number of good sellers are outraged by this. Sellers are leaving. If eBay ignores the strike, many more will go. Growth may well go flat. There could actually be a decline. Ebay's competitors will thank they for the experienced sellers.
By: Glenn Corning, Randomstore/owner
Sent: 02:26 AM Thu Feb.07.2008 - US

#5    I am done with eBay

I was an early adopter. Sold something back in 1998 for $600, got on the phone with the buyer worked out the details for I-escrow (now defunct).
I have bought/sold off and on as I need items or have things I no longer need that are still useful. It is not a business for me. I am a registered Paypal user. I didn't want to accept credit cards because of the additional fees involved. But there is no way to disengage the logo for credit cards if you, as Seller prefer to be paid by paypal. One buyer wanted to strong arm me into accepting his credit card, which I eventually did (losing money on the transaction) and he left a neutral. Gee thanks.
Then a buyer wins an auction, asks me to cancel it, refund his money and relist. I did so. I left feedback telling exactly what happened. "won bid, but cancelled asking me to relist" Then the Buyer leaves me a negative because of he didn't like the shipping costs. So now Donahue wants to remove any seller feedback on buyers unless it is positive. I am OVER IT.
I used to owned ebay stock but fortunately I got out of it before it started to tank. P.S. Don't screw up Skype. I like it.
By: Chere Lott,
Sent: 02:19 PM Thu Feb.07.2008 - US

#6    Ebay's Business Model

I disagree with Wharton's business experts. If Ebay's business model isn't broken, than I would argue that the business model is being poorly managed at the highest levels of Ebay.

A fundamental business practice is to communicate with your customer partners, in Ebay's case, its buyers and sellers.

Ebay chooses to make customer communication very difficult. One consequence of this is that many of the negative impacts of the new feedback policy are apparently not understood by Ebay's top management.

Simply stated, when Ebay executives blame the economy for the company's slowing growth, they only need to look at the Powerseller business they have inadvertantly chased to competitors such as Amazon.

Isn't it curious that Amazon didn't experience a similar slowdown to Ebay?

The reasons for this exodus of many of the small, but well-run and growing Powersellers, are not fee related, they are Ebay process related, and real.
By: John Sloan,
Sent: 04:48 PM Wed Aug.13.2008 - -
Comments are only open for the first 30 days after publishing.

Back to Top