Knowledge@Wharton Leadership and Change Research Article

View Article on Knowledge@Wharton Mobile

'The Art of Woo': Selling Your Ideas to the Entire Organization, One Person at a Time

Published: October 17, 2007 in Knowledge@Wharton
    Download Audio Play Audio
Article Image
Print Get PDF of Article Send a Comment Send to a Friend get the book
Bookmark and Share

Former Chrysler chairman Lee Iacocca once noted, "You can have brilliant ideas; but if you can't get them across, your ideas won't get you anywhere." In their new book, The Art of Woo: Using Strategic Persuasion to Sell Your Ideas, Wharton legal studies and business ethics professor G. Richard Shell and management consultant Mario Moussa provide a systematic approach to idea selling that addresses the problem Iacocca identified. As an example of effective persuasion, they tell the story of rock star Bono's visit to then-Senator Jesse Helms' Capitol Hill office to enlist his help in the global war against AIDS.

Bono had all the facts and figures at his fingertips, and launched into a detailed appeal based on this data. He was, in essence, speaking to Helms the same way he had recently spoken to executives and technical experts at the many foundations and corporations he had approached about this issue. But within a few minutes, Bono sensed that he was losing Helms' attention, and he instinctively changed his pitch. Knowing that Helms was a deeply religious man (and drawing on his own born-again Christian values), Bono began speaking of Jesus Christ's concern for the sick and poor. He argued that AIDS should be considered the 21st century equivalent of leprosy, an affliction cited in many Bible stories of the New Testament. Helms immediately sat up and began listening, and before the meeting was over had promised to be the Senate champion for Bono's cause. 

Examples such as this one illustrate what Shell and Moussa mean by "woo": It's the ability to "win others over" to your ideas without coercion, using relationship-based, emotionally intelligent persuasion. "The rock star Bono is superb at the art of woo because he understands what it takes to be a super-salesman, in the best sense of that term," says Shell. "Here you have a rock star with tinted glasses and an elderly, conservative Southern senator. But when Bono had the good sense to switch from public policy talk about debt relief -- what we call in our book the 'rationality' channel -- to religious talk about poverty and disease -- what we call the 'vision' channel -- he touched Helms' heart. He sold his idea and, in the process, created trust."

The word "woo," the authors note, has many meanings, but all of them relate to focusing on the person you are trying to persuade more than on your own needs and fears. "There is the obvious meaning related to courtship and romance," says Shell, "but there is also the more general idea of wooing people to seek their support. In addition, Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton have recently used the word 'woo' in their books to describe the ability to easily establish rapport with many different people." However "woo" may be defined, the authors argue that effectively selling ideas -- using persuasion rather than force -- is one of the most important skills that everyone from CEOs and entrepreneurs to team leaders and mid-level managers need to learn if they want to be effective in their organizations.

The Spirit of St. Louis

The Art of Woo presents a simple, four-step approach to the idea-selling process. First, persuaders need to polish their ideas and survey the social networks that will lead them to decision makers. To illustrate this step, Shell and Moussa recount how an unknown mail pilot named Charles Lindbergh turned his dream of being the first person to fly nonstop across the Atlantic into a reality. His idea was radical: He would make the crossing in a single-engine plane flying without a co-pilot or even a life raft. The idea was followed by his campaign to overcome people's disbelief that such a venture could ever work and to win over supporters in his hometown of St. Louis. Lindbergh started with contacts at the local airport who could see why his plan made sense and eventually worked his way up to the most influential businessmen in the city, using each person along the way to leverage an interview with the next.

The second stage of the Woo process is confronting what Shell and Moussa call "the five barriers" -- the five most common obstacles that can sink ideas before they get started. These include unreceptive beliefs, conflicting interests, negative relationships, a lack of credibility and failing to adjust one's communication mode to suit a particular audience or situation. Great persuaders throughout history have shared with Bono an instinct for overcoming this last barrier. For example, when Napoleon was a young officer at the siege of Toulon, he set up an artillery battery in such a dangerous location that his superiors thought he would never get troops to man it. They would have been right had Napoleon relied on the conventional "authority channel" and issued threats and orders to get his way. Instead, he demonstrated his social intelligence by switching to the visionary channel and creating a large placard that was placed next to the cannons. It read: "The Battery of the Men without Fear." The position was manned night and day.

Similarly, when Nelson Mandela was incarcerated on the notorious Robben Island in South Africa, he managed to obtain blankets and other necessities for his fellow prisoners by foregoing the expected high-minded appeals to politics and human rights. He worked instead on the relationship persuasion channel. By learning the guards' Afrikaans language and reading their literature, Mandela earned their respect and won them over to his idea of fair treatment -- even as he continued to face hostility from the officials who ran the prison.

The third stage is to pitch your idea in a compelling way. Shell and Moussa note that at Google, employees selling ideas to upper management are given a challenge: to distill their business concepts into short, punchy presentations that get right to the essence of what they are proposing. This discipline forces them to figure out exactly what problem their idea addresses, how their idea will solve it and why their idea is better than both the status quo and available alternatives. The authors offer a template for pitching ideas in this format and give examples of distinct ways one can personalize an idea to make it memorable and distinctive.

The final stage of Woo is to secure both individual and organizational commitments. "One of the most common mistakes people make in selling ideas," says Shell, "is to think that their job is finished once they succeed in getting someone to say 'yes' to their proposal. That's only the beginning. Research shows that in most organizations, a minimum of eight people will need to sign off on even simple ideas. The number goes up from there. So after you move the individual, you also have to move the organization."

Shell and Moussa use a number of cases from business history to illustrate this point. For example, they tell the story of Charles F. Kettering, a brilliant inventor and engineer from the 1930s whom many consider an equal of Thomas Edison. Kettering invented such things as the automatic transmission and safety plate glass, but one of his best ideas -- the air-cooled automobile engine -- sat on the shelf for decades until the Volkswagen Beetle incorporated it. Kettering convinced Alfred Sloan, GM's top executive, that producing the air-cooled engine was a good idea, and the company's executive committee gave the go-ahead to make a limited number of cars with the prototype. But instead of following the idea through, Kettering went back to his lab to concentrate on the technical aspects of the project. The committee handed the production assignment to the Chevrolet division, whose top managers had never been brought into the persuasion process. They let the idea languish and it was eventually abandoned. "Kettering made a fundamental mistake: He didn't follow up and keep the pressure on," Shell notes. "He didn't do the political coalition-building needed to implement his idea."

Andy Grove's 'Constructive Confrontation'

Individual personality plays a key role in how you influence others, Shell adds. The book therefore includes two personalized "diagnostic" tests that readers can take to discover their persuasion strengths and weaknesses. One of the diagnostics is the "Six Channels Survey," which is designed to help people learn which of the key channels of influence they feel compelled to use most often at work and which they would prefer to use if given a choice. These channels include Authority, Rationality, Vision, Relationships, Interests and Politics. The idea is to help readers understand both how these six channels work and when they should adjust their pitch -- as Bono did with Senator Helms and Mandela did on Robben Island -- to appeal to different kinds of audiences.

A second self-administered test, the Persuasion Styles Assessment, helps readers determine the degrees of assertiveness and natural social intelligence they bring to the idea-selling process. The authors point out that there is no one "correct" style of persuasion; rather, the key is being self-aware so you know how you perform and how others will perceive you.

For example, Shell and Moussa illustrate the "Driver" style (a highly assertive type who gives only limited attention to the social environment) by examining how Intel CEO Andy Grove managed the persuasion process at Intel during his years as that company's leader. Labeled the "screamer," Grove could be intimidating to people who didn't know him well. But he was also willing to listen if people stood up to him and matched his passion. To facilitate communication, Grove instituted what he called a culture of "constructive confrontation" that freed everyone to be as blunt and assertive as he was. The result was a high-stress environment, but one in which everyone could speak their minds.

The Art of Woo goes on to describe four other distinctive styles with examples drawn from business history. Banker J. P. Morgan is given as the model for the Commander (a Grove-like person who has a quieter demeanor), John D. Rockefeller exemplifies the Chess Player (a quieter person who attends strategically to the social environment), Andrew Carnegie's life provides the example for the Promoter style (a gregarious type who uses high levels of social intelligence), and Sam Walton is the model for the style that strikes the balance among all the others -- the Advocate.

Three Typical Mistakes

Both Shell and Moussa have wide experience in the area of negotiations. Shell is director of Wharton Executive Education's Negotiation Workshop and author of Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Moussa teaches executive education courses on negotiation and organizational change and is head of the Negotiation Practice Group at management consulting firm CFAR (the Center for Applied Research). This year, Shell and Moussa launched a new Wharton Executive Education program called the Strategic Persuasion Workshop.

The idea for the book arose from the comments of executive education participants who frequently spoke about internal negotiation problems they were facing in their companies. These conversations gave the authors the idea to "talk about persuasion inside organizations, with a focus on selling ideas," says Shell. "We had a laser beam into the crisis moment when you're sitting at the table and you've got an idea or an initiative or a program, and you're trying to get buy-in from a decision maker. From there, we built out the strategic process that can prepare you for that moment in the best possible way. By doing that, we were able to identify the key personality traits that great persuaders share and develop the diagnostic surveys to help people gain insights into their own styles and approaches."

Asked what the top three mistakes are that people make in selling ideas, Shell notes that the number one-error is "egocentric bias," or "focusing on yourself instead of your audience. People assume that the person they are trying to sell on their idea is just like them, that he or she has the same primary goals and frame of reference, and that what they are talking about is important to the other side. But other people may not care at all about what is important to you.... It's a killer assumption."

A second mistake is the belief that there are no systematic ways to persuade people to accept an idea. "A lot of people just wing it, thinking they can count on their own experience and instinctive powers of persuasion to carry the day," says Shell. "But in fact, you do need a strategy. That is what this book is about."

The third most common error is to forget about organizational politics, as Charles Kettering did at General Motors. "Whenever a new idea might affect resources, power, control or turf," Shell says, "politics will be part of the problem at the implementation stage. You need to prepare an idea-selling campaign, not just a presentation."

The authors suggest that people working in any group -- from the largest Fortune 500 company to an entrepreneurial startup -- can benefit from improving their skills at the art of persuasion. As Shell notes: "Influencing others in an organization to accept and act on your ideas is a challenge that never goes away."

Back to Top

Here's what you think...

Total Comments: 11

#1    Art of Woo

This is an excellent piece. It's amazing how people have very little understanding of how to push ideas in their own environment and struggle to figure out a way. Traditionally, pushing one's idea has been viewed as a very situation related thing where in one couldnt rely on a set of guidelines to follow. This article very easily summarizes those guidelines which can be universally applicable.

Though, as always is the case, after having read the article and the persuasion steps simplified it all sounds like common sense. That's what makes it a nice read, cause that means, author has been able to get his point across easily.
By: Vaibhav Joshi,
Sent: 05:53 AM Thu Oct.18.2007 - IN

#2    The art of Woo

Excellent article and a subject that needs more attention. There are many organizations, in particular those that have no direct mandate for sales and marketing accumen, that suffer from not being able to effectively sell and implement business plans. Teach organizations to ensure there is a planned approach to implement change using WOO skills. The subject is challenging because it requires people to self examine, learn style and to focus on audience when planning change. An organization cannot grow in this area unless the management promotes opportunity situations that help people to learn WOO.
By: Bruce St. Louis, MGS
Sent: 09:08 AM Thu Oct.18.2007 - CA

#3    Why politicians thrive

True yes- and frighteningly so. It illustrates why political personalities- whom we instinctively loathe because of their chameleon-like and Machavellian instincts- rule over us.

The ability to speak the other man's language, empathize with his prejudices, wear his skin and tell him what he wants to hear- these are what wins elections. It's also what guarantees success in corporate environments. The result is, too many skilled political animals make it to the top, while those that can get things done suffer for the sin of not being sufficiently oleaginous.

Many people cannot violate their personal integrity to the degree needed to persuade others. If you think Christianity is hogwash, how would you persuade Helms using Bono's approach - without being an utter hypocrite? If you think a new product will boost the bottom line, why should you have to deploy the skills of a snake oil salesman or back room horse-trader to get it approved?

Things won't change. Corporate politicians will become leaders, while the execution wonks will remain their subordinates. But I can't help feeling that the organization that is better at looking at the underlying idea - rather than the way it is packaged and sold- will always have some sort of competitive advantage.
By: Hakeem Yesufu,
Sent: 12:55 AM Sat Oct.20.2007 - BN

#4    Selling Ideas in Enterprise 2.0

The corporate ecosystems, in which disruptive and innovative ideas evolve and thrive, are changing at a fast pace with the support of new tools such as community forums, wikis, blogs and corporate social networks allowing sharing assets and ideas.

The large majority of senior executives are not yet involved in these burgeoning networks. When they are, probably in the coming decade, these networks will be key media through which ideas will be sold and deployed invasively in large multinational corporations, or large clusters of enterprises.

Progressively, new generations and some advanced thought leaders bring in corporations a culture pushing ideas in the same way as on the Internet. They are adapting this culture and code of conduct at work for selling their ideas.

The new media of the future “Enterprise 2.0” will not change the “six channels” and the interpersonal persuasion process in their deep nature, but they will allow more people to participate in selling ideas (leading to opportunities and threats).

If senior executives stay aside from these new networks, they will become out of step with a growing part of their organisation and will not be able to harness the related benefits.
By: Vincent DUMAIN, Capgemini / Efficiency Manager & KM Leader
Sent: 01:38 PM Sun Oct.21.2007 - -

#5    Good Article

The authors have presented a good article. Wooing people has been integral in business from time immemorial and continues to be. It can be observed from more common day experiences where a roadside hawker convinces shoppers to go for his merchandise to multinational companies which do that on a grander scale (advertising, getting starts to promote etc.,).
By: Aditya , SRG
Sent: 04:31 PM Mon Oct.22.2007 - US

#6    Great article

This is a great article, I especially liked its emphasis on emotional intelligence.
By: Ritesh Srivastava, Datamatics Technologies Limited
Sent: 02:17 AM Wed Oct.24.2007 - IN

#7    People are not fools

Today, in the corporate world, people are not so foolish that they can be wooed by ideas that are not going to affect them personally. Few people are willing to accept the point of view of others. No doubt, they might listen to your idea, but when the time comes to implement it, first they will measure it through their own principles.
By: Chetan Bharat,
Sent: 07:49 AM Wed Oct.24.2007 - US

#8    Excellent eye opener

For the first time someone has taken the care to study the bewildering array of successful styles that all of us encounter throughout our work-lives. Typically, and simplistically, we tend to dismiss them as "politics", "sweet talk" or worse. This framework is well thought out and looks like a good place to get started. I congratulate the authors for bringing up a highly critical area of management, indeed life.
By: Arunavh Palchaudhuri, Godfrey Phillips Ltd, GM (Six Sigma)
Sent: 08:59 AM Fri Oct.26.2007 - IN

#9    Must-read for all leaders

My immediate reaction is, "Wow" -- this makes sense. My entire leadership team can use it. Without any question this book is a must-read for any leader at any level. It answers quite a few questions on why we fail to influence even when we have great ideas.
By: Papiya Banerjee, Aviva Global Services / Head of HR
Sent: 09:58 AM Sun Oct.28.2007 - IN

#10    Practical experience

This article is very good. To me, credibility is very important in the art of woo. In my experience, ideas sometimes can be sold more easily when they come from people with high levels of authority.
By: Chan Dy Ot, Cambodia Brewery Limited
Sent: 04:00 AM Sat Nov.03.2007 - KH

#11    The act of wooing

Only good execution of an idea brings out the real essence of the concept of the idea. The act of wooing therefore is the platform that brings about understanding, acceptance and commitment to get buy in into the idea, which facilitates implementation. The article brings home the simple fact that people will only act whole heartedly implementing ideas they have emotional buy in into. I guess it's common sense but alien to management.
By: Tolani Oyekanmi, Sales man
Sent: 02:00 PM Mon Jan.07.2008 - US
Comments are only open for the first 30 days after publishing.

Back to Top